New Directive Raises Cost of Using Music in Political Campaigns

Musicians across Kenya are set to benefit from a new government directive that significantly increases the fees politicians must pay to use music during campaign activities.

The Ministry of Youth Affairs, Creative Economy and Sports has introduced revised tariffs aimed at ensuring artists receive fair compensation as the country gears up for the 2027 election cycle.

The changes are outlined in the Consolidated Music and Audiovisual Works Tariff, which requires political parties and individual candidates to pay for the use of copyrighted music in promoting their agendas.

New pricing structure for campaigns
Under the new guidelines, political parties will pay the highest flat rate. Any party intending to use music for rallies, launches, and general campaign activities will now be required to pay KSh 600,000 annually.

Individual candidates will be charged based on the positions they are contesting:

  • Presidential candidates: KSh 500,000
  • Governors: KSh 200,000
  • Senators: KSh 150,000
  • Members of the National Assembly (including Woman Representatives): KSh 100,000
  • Members of County Assembly (MCAs): KSh 15,000

The move is expected to provide much-needed income for artists, whose work is often widely used during campaign periods without proper compensation.

Strengthening the creative economy
The directive was gazetted by Salim Vurya as part of broader efforts to formalise and protect Kenya’s creative sector.

For years, artists have raised concerns about the unauthorised use of their music during elections, with little or no financial return. The new tariffs are intended to establish a clear legal framework that ensures creators are paid whenever their work is used in political campaigns.

Many musicians have welcomed the move, noting that campaign seasons often demand high levels of performance and exposure without corresponding financial benefits. With the new structure in place, artists stand to gain when their songs become campaign anthems.

Looking ahead to 2027
As political activity begins to build ahead of the 2027 Kenyan General Election, the directive is expected to professionalise how music is used in the public space.

For many artists, music remains their primary source of income, and the rising cost of living has made sustainability a challenge. The revised tariffs offer a potential financial boost, giving creatives hope for greater stability both during and beyond the election period.

PAVRISK Proposal Seeks Steep Royalty Fee Hikes for Bars, DJs, and Matatus

The Performing and Audiovisual Rights Society of Kenya (PAVRISK) has unveiled a proposal to sharply increase royalty fees for businesses that play music or videos in public spaces, sparking immediate debate among business owners, artists, and industry stakeholders.

The proposed 2026–2028 tariffs, published in the Kenya Gazette on August 12, 2025, are open for public feedback until September. If approved, the changes would represent significant jumps across multiple categories:

  • Bars and cafés: KSh 10,000 annually

  • DJs: KSh 20,000 annually

  • Matatus: KSh 5,500–12,000 annually, depending on size and usage

  • Top hotels: Up to KSh 600,000 annually

These figures are considerably higher than previous Music Copyright Society of Kenya (MCSK) schedules, where hotels paid between KSh 8 and KSh 17 per square foot and matatus faced lower flat rates.

Rationale Behind the Increase

PAVRISK says the adjustments align with global trends, pointing to a 7% rise in worldwide royalty collections in 2024 (CISAC Annual Report). The organisation argues the changes are necessary to ensure fairer compensation for Kenyan artists, who have historically received less than 20% of collected licensing fees due to administrative costs and inefficiencies.

The push follows 2024 reforms by the Kenya Copyright Board (KECOBO), which licensed three Collective Management Organisations — PAVRISK, MCSK, and PRISK — to improve transparency after years of disputes over mismanagement.

Kenya’s music industry is estimated to generate KSh 10 billion annually, yet KECOBO’s 2023 data shows artists received only KSh 26 million out of an estimated KSh 180 million in royalties.

Who Stands to Gain — and Lose

The proposed hikes would impact a wide spectrum of businesses, from matatu operators to luxury hotels. Smaller operators warn the new fees could threaten their survival, while high-end establishments may be forced to review entertainment budgets. DJs, small bars, and cafés also face steeper annual charges.

Artists could benefit if the increased collections reach them, but many remain sceptical. Critics on X have questioned whether the reforms will improve transparency or merely expand bureaucracy.

Public Response

Reaction has been mixed. Supporters argue that better pay for creators is long overdue, while opponents warn of economic strain on small businesses. Some social media users have joked about cafés switching to classical music to dodge fees, while others doubt artists will see any meaningful gains.

A Nairobi matatu operator told Kenyans.co.ke that the higher charges, combined with soaring fuel prices, could “push some of us out of business.” Others have sought clarification on whether the tariffs also apply to international music.

How to Submit Feedback

Public submissions are open until September 2025. Feedback can be sent via email to info@pavrisk.or.ke, delivered to PAVRISK’s Nairobi office at P.O. Box 1124-00502, Karen, or shared with KECOBO at info@copyright.go.ke. Updates will be posted on pavrisk.or.ke and copyright.go.ke.

Global Context

Similar royalty hikes have sparked disputes in other countries. In Nigeria, a 15% increase in 2023 by the Musical Copyright Society of Nigeria (MCSN) led to widespread protests and a temporary court injunction. Industry experts suggest Kenya could consider tiered rates or rural exemptions to balance fair artist compensation with business sustainability.

The outcome of the ongoing public consultation will determine whether the new tariffs take effect in 2026.

Court Rules on MCSK Royalty Collection – Impact on Musicians Explained

The Music Copyright Society of Kenya (MCSK) has faced a legal blow after the High Court ruled against its bid to continue collecting royalties for its members.

Court Ruling on MCSK’s Petition

On Monday, March 3, 2025, Lady Justice J.W. Mong’are dismissed MCSK’s petition, stating that, under the Copyright Act, such disputes should first be addressed by the Copyright Tribunal. The ruling effectively strips MCSK of its authority to operate as a Collective Management Organisation (CMO).

In a public notice, the Kenya Copyright Board (KECOBO) confirmed that MCSK no longer has the mandate to collect royalties, advising music users accordingly.

KECOBO’s Directive

Following the ruling, KECOBO has instructed MCSK to cease presenting itself as a licensed CMO. The Board also noted that it is handling other legal matters related to CMO licensing and will provide updates in due course.

KECOBO previously granted licensing rights to the Performing and Audiovisual Rights Society of Kenya (PAVRISK) in June 2024. However, this decision was later revoked by the Copyright Tribunal in case COPTA/E002/2024, with an appeal now pending before the High Court.

Legal Implications for Unauthorized Royalty Collection

KECOBO has warned that, under Section 46 (12) of the Copyright Act, anyone collecting royalties without proper authorization is committing an offense, punishable by fines or imprisonment.

The Board has urged stakeholders in the creative industry to remain patient as the government works to establish a more transparent and efficient royalty collection system.

Impact on Musicians

MCSK has long been criticized for alleged mismanagement and lack of transparency in royalty distribution. While the ruling aims to regulate the sector, it leaves musicians uncertain about when and how they will receive their earnings. The next steps taken by KECOBO and the courts will shape the future of royalty collection in Kenya.

MCSK To Be Sued For Missing Millions In Artist’s Royalties

The Music Copyright Society of Kenya (MCSK) and the Kenya Copyright Board (KECOBO) are embroiled in a dispute regarding the distribution of royalties collected in 2023. This follows accusations of potential financial mismanagement by MCSK.

On February 21st, KECOBO chairman Joshua Kutuny publicly alleged that MCSK failed to account for Ksh56 million collected from artists’ royalties last year. He claimed this discrepancy arose during a meeting where MCSK, along with other music organizations, presented their financial records.

MCSK Denies Allegations

MCSK CEO Ezekiel Mutua vehemently denied these accusations, calling them “wild allegations” intended to mislead musicians. He announced legal action against KECOBO for spreading misinformation.

According to KECOBO, their investigation revealed a total collection of Ksh249 million from January to December 2023. However, they claim MCSK reported only Ksh209 million, raising questions about the remaining Ksh40 million. This includes Ksh26 million from joint collections and Ksh30 million from other sources like international CMOs and Google Ireland.

The legal action threatened by MCSK and the ongoing investigation by KECOBO indicate a potential escalation of this dispute. Transparency regarding the collection and distribution of royalties remains a critical concern for Kenyan musicians.

The government intends to use eCitizen to pay artist royalties

The Public Service Cabinet Secretary Moses Kuria has announced ambitious plans to modernize the payment of artists’ royalties using the government’s eCitizen platform.

In a statement issued on February 11, the CS revealed that efforts are underway to amend the Copyright Act, which will facilitate the establishment of a government-operated Collective Management Organisation.

Once implemented, artists will be able to conveniently monitor their royalty earnings through the centralized eCitizen platform.

“All music copyrights and royalties will be processed via eCitizen. Artists will have individual registrations, enabling them to track their earnings online. The era of artist exploitation is coming to an end,” he stated on his X platform.

Currently, copyright royalties are managed and distributed by organizations such as the Music Copyright Society of Kenya (MCSK), Kenya Association of Music Producers (KAMP), and the Performers Rights Society of Kenya (PRISK).

However, artists affiliated with these associations have frequently complained about insufficient compensation and irregular payment of royalties.

List of MCSK’s top earners of royalties through 2024

Perhaps a positive shift is underway, signifying progress or merely the appearance of one. However, skepticism still lingers among many artists regarding the distribution of royalties.

For decades, Kenyan artists have bemoaned the meager royalties allocated to them in each distribution cycle by the three Collective Management Organizations (CMO): Music Copyright of Kenya (MCSK), Kenya Association of Music Producers (KAMP), and Performers Right Society of Kenya (PRISK).

When Dr. Ezekiel Mutua assumed the position of CEO at MCSK in March 2022, he promised Kenyan musicians that he would make them ‘billionaires.’ However, his appointment generated mixed reactions due to his controversial past as the CEO of the Kenya Films Classification Board (KFCB), marked by online disputes with artists.

“At KFCB, I was a regulator, so I was not there to make friends. But in my new role, I am here to fight for artists. My promise to all musicians is ‘pesa mfukoni’ (money in your pocket). I am here to make our artists billionaires. I will fight for artists the same way I fought for journalists while at the Kenya Union of Journalists,” he declared a week into his new role.

Since taking office, Dr. Mutua has engaged in extensive rhetoric and self-promotion, a characteristic he seems to favor. Nonetheless, his tenure has shown early signs of changes in royalty distributions.

In May 2023, his first distribution as the new MCSK boss was Sh15 million, with the highest earner receiving Sh330,000 and the lowest receiving Sh258. While this represented an improvement from previous years, many artists expressed discontent.

Vocalist Bien Aime Baraza argued that MCSK could still do better despite receiving Sh14,634, an improvement from the Sh2,500 he had received in 2022. In response, Mutua defended MCSK, stating that the distribution was better given the license issues they faced with the regulator, the Kenya Copyright Board of Kenya (KECOBO).

On January 25, MCSK made its first royalties payout of the quarter, totaling Sh20 million at Safari Park Hotel, Nairobi. The earnings were higher than the previous distribution, with the lowest recipient getting Sh5,000 and the highest receiving close to Sh800,000, according to Mutua.

While the list might not be exhaustive, here are some of the highest earners from the recent disbursement, as disclosed at Safari Park:

  1. Rehema Lugose – Sh757,092
  2. Rueben Kigame – Sh122,410
  3. Otile Brown – Sh120,000
  4. Praise Makena – Sh110,000
  5. Marakwet Daughter – Sh108,123
  6. Stephen Kasolo – Sh106,862
  7. Joseph Shisia Wasira – Sh101,137
  8. Joseph Ngala – Sh101,032
  9. Jackson Wambua – Sh91,524
  10. Solomon Mkubwa – Sh74,138
  11. De Mathew – Sh70,094.

Other artists receiving over Sh100,000 but choosing not to disclose their payments publicly included Bien Aime Baraza, Nyashinski, Jua Cali, Florence Mureithi, Octopizzo, Samido, Steve K, and gospel singers Deno, Mary Wanjiru (Shiro Wa JP), Ruth Wamuyu, Anastacia Mukabwa, and Sharry Martin.

MCSK distributes Sh15 million in royalties, but some artists are disappointed.

The Music Copyright Society of Kenya (MCSK) recently distributed Sh15 million in royalties to its over 16,000 members. However, the distribution drew mixed reactions from artists, with some expressing disappointment over what they perceive as meager payouts.

Criticism has centered on the sporadic nature of these distributions, which often fall short of artists’ expectations. In April of this year, renowned Sauti Sol vocalist Bien Aime Baraza used sarcasm to highlight the issue, sharing that he had received Sh14,634, a marked improvement from the Sh2,500 he had received in a previous distribution.

MCSK CEO Ezekiel Mutua defended the recent distribution, describing it as a significant step forward. He acknowledged that the disparity in payouts largely depended on the extent of airplay an artist received.

“Our hope is now, once we streamline things, musicians will make money. We had a choice to make when we got Sh15 million whether to distribute or not. We knew some would be happy while others would not because it depends on the airplay,” Mr Mutua explained.

Notably, during the recent distribution, MCSK faced challenges related to its licensing status. The organization was embroiled in a dispute with the regulator, Kenya Copyright Board (KECOBO), which had refused to renew its license. Mutua indicated that this issue had contributed to MCSK’s inability to collect a significant amount in royalties.

Regarding the distribution figures, Mutua revealed that the highest earner received Sh330,000, while the lowest earner received Sh637. However, there have been questions raised about the accuracy of these figures. Comedian and musician Oga Obinna shared a screenshot suggesting that he had received Sh258.

The MCSK distribution has once again highlighted the challenges facing musicians in Kenya. While the organization has taken steps to improve the situation, it is clear that more needs to be done to ensure that artists are fairly compensated for their work.

Khaligraph Jones claps back after MCSK audit report revealed theft of musician’s royalties

Kenyan musicians have been rioting over the extremely poor leadership of copyright board, MCSK among other key organizations involved, who have for years paid up royalties in form of peanuts.

The wide view among artistes was that the industry was not conducive enough for the growth of their exceptional talents which have since been taken for granted. Some wishing they had started their careers overseas which would have now multiplied the kind of reception they are receiving in their own country.

Kenyan female rapper, Femi One

Weeks after their ugly rants went viral, a drastic audit was made among those corporates involved in collecting royalties for artists, with reports finally out clearly indicating that musicians’ royalties had been swindled.

Also read: “Pack your bags and leave!” Femi One urges Kenyan artists

MCSK, PRiSK and Kamp were among bodies majorly touched on by the forensic audit from 2017 to 2019 that unearthed deep-rooted inefficiencies in the systems. Findings that were presented to KeCoBo chairman Mutuma Mathiu on Tuesday in form of a draft report.

“The non-compliance exposes the three societies to serious risks of misappropriation of funds, civil and criminal liability and loss of income from penalties and sanctions,” read the statement in part.

A report that popular rapper, Khaligraph Jones has now given his two cents on, clarifying that an audit was not worth the sweat at the very least.

Also read: Artistes should not fear to ask questions about their money – Khaligraph speaks in regard to MCSK ‘peanut’ payments

Because it was not news that some form of corruption scandals had been going on for the longest time possible and the entertainers continue to suffer even with all the numerous press briefings being given currently.

The Audit was Unnecessary, We have been Saying this from The beginning, The Kenyan Entertainment industry keeps on Suffering, DJs ,Artists, Event Organizers, Bouncers, Dancers Waiters, Club Owners, Restaurants etc,

Influential Kenyan rapper, Khaligraph Jones

Feedback

His sentiments attracted mixed reactions from fans, some against, others for it.

kajijoh Khaii ????????????too bad

 

___.lyrical.__.lenix.__ Mimi kutoka #2015 sijawahi pata hata bob????????. Huwa nasikia tu wasanii walilipwa yet nili_register na nikapeana hadi registration fee.. Lakini Mungu si Yuko ????

 

its__kohe__ Sawa papa jones the real OG????????????????

 

officialsajim corona is inevitable so they have to allow you guys to continue with daily activities as tulivo zoea jaman daaah,????????ni bata mwanzo mwishoooo????

MCSK should be transparent with artists

I have been following the drama that has pitted the Music Copyright Society of Kenya (MCSK) against local artists over the last two weeks and I realized a couple of things that I thought I should share with you.

First, it’s pretty obvious that MCSK failed at dissemination of information. You see, most artists received Ksh. 2530 from the body and they didn’t really know what the money was for and this led them to conclude that it was payment for their songs.

Khaligraph Jones
Khaligraph Jones

However, if MCSK had made them understand that the money was distributed evenly to the 14,000 members of the body as a flat payment i.e. by virtue of belonging to the organisation, I don’t think any of them would have come out to protest.

When the storm started brewing, MCSK explained that the money that most artists had received was for being a member of the organisation. They also told artists that they would get their royalties in October. However, it was too little too late.

Secondly, MCSK needs to be transparent with artists because this tiff about royalties has existed since the early 2000s when the body was formulated. I can still remember the day Poxy Presha staged a protest while demanding his dues.

Artists should get a breakdown of their royalties to see how the final amount that they are getting was arrived at. Otherwise, we’ll continue seeing situations where they wait for artists to raise a red flag and then they are given more money.

Timmy Tdat

Lastly, MCSK should create a portal where artists can log in and update their new songs. As things are now, an artist has to go to their offices, presumably with a CD, to let the body know that they has a new song. Why is this still happening in 2019?

“Tutakuja Kuwavuruga huko mbaya sana!” Khaligraph Jones among other artistes lash out at MCSK for paying them peanuts

After Khaligraph Jones decided to tell off MCSK for sending him Ksh 2,530 as payment for his music; it now seems that other artistes have also come out to protest against them!

https://www.instagram.com/p/B1HW2WYhjTO/?igshid=yo28n7dryi6l

This is because it appears that the Music Copyright Society of Kenya Ltd has been ripping them off and benefiting from the artistes hard work; yet they don’t bother to reward the musicians what they truly deserve.

Petty Royalties

According to King Kaka, MCSK might have received about Ksh 37Million that is if you multiply the Ksh 2500 by the number of artistes (15000) registered under MCSK.

https://www.instagram.com/p/B1HsXgoDqbm/?igshid=1rhtdxb83rnp8

He went on to add that all they do is buy new cars and feed themselves with other people’s money….but this is about to come to an end.

Fena Gitu also couldn’t hold back from calling out the MCSK for paying her peanuts as royalties to her music she posted saying;

https://www.instagram.com/p/B1HR6oAhEXE/?igshid=1puppeegdrdq6