Woman Among Viral Russian Man Videos Claims She Knew She Was Being Recorded

Choice, one of the Kenyan women at the center of the viral videos involving a Russian content creator, has finally shared her side of the story. In an interview with YouTuber 2mbili on Monday, February 16, she clarified that while she consented to being on camera for “content,” the boundaries of that consent have since become a major point of concern.

​Consent and Content Creation

​Choice, who is a content creator herself, explained that she initially viewed the filming as a professional endeavor. Because she understood that her partner made a living through digital media, she didn’t find the constant presence of cameras unusual at first.

She was fully aware of being filmed during daily chores, such as cooking, washing dishes, and eating breakfast.

​ Choice firmly denied engaging in any unprotected intimacy, stating she was not “stupid enough” to take such risks with a stranger.

​A 60-Day Relationship

​According to Choice, their connection wasn’t a brief encounter. The two met in August 2025 at the Nairobi Airport while she was headed to Mombasa. The man reportedly convinced her to change her plans to travel with him and his team. They spent approximately 60 days together, moving between apartments in Nairobi, Mombasa, Diani, and Nyali.

​Growing Discomfort

​Despite the initial agreement, the relationship eventually soured due to the man’s obsession with recording every interaction. Choice noted that his constant use of Ray-Ban Meta glasses and his phone for recording became a major source of friction, making her increasingly uncomfortable before the relationship ended.

Nyako Defends Women Involved With Viral Russian Man

Germany-based Kenyan TikToker Nyako has stepped into the heated online debate surrounding a Russian man accused of secretly filming intimate encounters with Kenyan women. In a video posted on Sunday, February 15, the “TikTok President” made it clear that she refuses to join the chorus of condemnation aimed at the women involved.

​Nyako’s stance is rooted in a mix of bodily autonomy and the harsh economic realities that drive people to seek a better life abroad.

​Opportunity and Ambition

​Nyako argued that many of these women viewed the encounter as a potential “ticket” to a life in Europe. She challenged the public’s outrage, questioning why onlookers feel entitled to police women’s decisions.

“Those women saw their opportunity to come to Europe, and they used it with their bodies. I cannot judge them.”

​She pointedly asked why the public is bothered when it wasn’t their own bodies involved, stating,

“If it is not your body… why are you bothered?”

​Calling Out Hypocrisy

​A significant portion of Nyako’s defense focused on the backlash from men. She highlighted the double standards often found in societal moralizing, noting that many men “trashing” these women are often unfaithful themselves.

​She further addressed claims that some women left their husbands to meet the man, arguing that the desperate desire to relocate to Europe often outweighs other factors. Whether the women were married or working as security guards, Nyako insisted their choices are their own.

​”I will defend all those women myself because I understand that even some of them who are married were seeking to come to Europe. People should consider the economic realities that might push women to make such decisions instead of rushing to condemn them.”

​A “Civilized World”

​Nyako concluded by dismissing the shock surrounding the scandal, noting that in a modern, civilized world, individuals should be free to do as they please with their lives. She urged the public to stop debating whether these women had “feelings” or were “right,” reiterating that personal choice should be the final word.